HomeCryptoJury in Craig Wright lawsuit 'can not all agree on a verdict'

Jury in Craig Wright lawsuit ‘can not all agree on a verdict’

The courtroom case between Australian Craig Wright and the property of his now deceased good friend David Kleiman over authorized rights to tens of billions of {dollars} price of Bitcoin mined by Satoshi Nakamoto might finish in a mistrial if jurors stay deadlocked.

Wright claims he used the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto when he invented Bitcoin. The case being deliberated started in 2018 when the property of his affiliate Kleiman sued him on the grounds the pair have been companions who’d invented and mined Bitcoin collectively

By about 5PM UTC on Nov. 2, the jury was deadlocked, having issued the next assertion:

“Unfortunately we cannot come to a conclusion and we cannot all agree on a verdict on any of the questions.”

As of 10PM UTC, the jury remained deadlocked and is ready to return tomorrow, based on courtroom reporter Carolina Bolada from Law360.

Judge Beth Bloom issued an Allen Charge instructing the jury to proceed deliberating till it reaches a verdict. She mentioned, “I suggest that you now carefully reexamine and reconsider all the evidence in light of the court’s instructions on the law.”

If the jury is still unable to reach a verdict, however, the judge could declare a mistrial.

The stakes in the case are high. Both sides contend that Wright is Satoshi, however they are at odds over the ownership of 1.1 million Bitcoin (BTC) mined at the time. As of today, that 1.1 million BTC is worth $62,568,836,000.

Related: Was the first reply to the Bitcoin white paper Satoshi themself? In-depth theory

In court, David Kleiman’s brother Ira argued on behalf of the estate that Wright broke an oral agreement with David to mine Bitcoin and develop its technology together.

Wright claims that no such partnership existed, and that at most Kleiman proofread the Bitcoin whitepaper since he was not a developer and could not have debugged the Bitcoin code.